Beware: Hot cake can also burn your mouth

Sweet cake is delicious, anxious will inevitably burn the mouth.

Disruptive technology has shown a “double-edged sword” influence on China’s future industrial development, and its risks must be objectively and rationally faced.

First of all, the high risk of disruptive technologies will bring some uncertainties to the development of future industries.

The future AO2000-LS25 industry from the incubation stage to the stage of industrialization scale, the need for emerging technology, cutting-edge technology and disruptive technology breakthrough and promotion, so disruptive technology breakthrough and future industrial development have a high degree of linkage. The disruptive technology itself has a strong high risk, which brings a lot of uncertainty to the future development of the industry.

The biggest uncertainty is that once the disruptive technological breakthrough stalls, it will not only trap the innovation resources invested in the early stage into the sunk cost consideration, but also lead to the expected future industry unable to enter the substantial development stage, thus being “killed” in the bud.

Second, the strong timeliness of subversive technology will bring AO2000-LS25 pressure to seize the opportunity for China’s future industries to participate in international competition simultaneously.

Disruptive technology has a strong timeliness, and all countries in the world are laying out the development of disruptive technology, and the scientific and technological competition among countries is in a white-hot state.

Once a country has made a major breakthrough in a key disruptive technology and rapidly promotes the industrialization of technology, and China cannot follow up in time, it will miss the development opportunity and be in a passive position in the future industrial competition, which is not conducive to our national defense strategy and industrial security.

More importantly, the uncertainty of disruptive technologies can bring volatility interference to the future AO2000-LS25 growth path of industries in a particular direction.

When the state selects a group of future industries, it will invest corresponding funds, talents and other resources to focus on development, and have a preset development path and track. The disruptive emergence of disruptive technologies may break the development trajectory of specific future industries, making their technological progress and market cultivation, industrial coordination and coordination appear unbalanced, which is not conducive to the long-term stable and healthy development of future industries.

3. Suggestion: Plan the layout with a larger pattern and AO2000-LS25 wider vision

Facing the “14th Five-Year Plan” and the long-range goal of 2035, China’s layout of future industries must not only seize major subversive technological innovation group breakthrough opportunities, but also plan and layout scientific and technological frontier fields with a larger pattern and broader vision, and build new advantages of future-oriented industrial competition. Specifically, it is recommended to start from three levels:

First, scientific research and judgment of the two-sided impact of disruptive technologies on future industrial development.

On the one hand, it is necessary to strengthen the systematic, objective and comprehensive understanding of disruptive technologies, and cannot ignore the inherent regularity, uncertainty and complexity of technological innovation because of the hype concept, nor can it ignore its guiding and AO2000-LS25 promoting significance for future industries because of the breakthrough difficulties of disruptive technologies.

On the other hand, to strengthen the top-level design to promote the development of disruptive technologies, it is recommended to attach great importance to the global strategic research of disruptive technologies, improve the scientific insight and strategic cognition of disruptive technologies, strengthen the top-level policy and coordination among governments for frontier scientific and technological innovation, further attach importance to technology reserves, and clarify the near -, medium – and long-term goals of disruptive technologies. Progress will be made in steps and stages in an orderly manner.

In addition, to improve the “from 0 to 1” independent innovation capability, build a solid AO2000-LS25 foundation for future industrial development, it is recommended that relevant departments, research institutions and enterprises coordinate, gather superior teams, focus on major national strategic needs, strengthen demand-oriented basic research, and strengthen multi-path exploration of cutting-edge technologies, cross-integration and disruptive technology supply.

In the process of disruptive technology research breakthroughs, it is not only necessary to highlight the whole process of innovation chain from basic research, applied research, small and pilot trials, demonstration to promotion and application, but also to pay attention to the coordination and overall promotion of the whole industrial chain in terms of policy supporting, innovation environment, and talent training.